DEX vs CEX
FXC911 – Forex & Crypto News & Insights
Here’s a detailed table comparing Decentralized Exchanges (DEX) and Centralized Exchanges (CEX) based on 30 Key Performance Indicators (KPIs):
KPI
DEX
CEX
Control of Funds
Users retain full control of funds.
Funds controlled by the exchange (custodial).
Security
High; no central point of failure.
Moderate; vulnerable to hacking due to centralization.
Regulation
Often unregulated or lightly regulated.
Heavily regulated in most jurisdictions.
Transparency
Fully transparent; transactions visible on the blockchain.
Limited; depends on the platform's policies.
Ease of Use
Moderate; requires knowledge of wallets and keys.
High; user-friendly interfaces and support.
Liquidity
Lower; depends on user activity and AMM algorithms.
Higher; due to centralized order books and market makers.
Speed of Transactions
Slower; depends on blockchain network speed.
Faster; controlled by centralized systems.
Privacy
High; no KYC/AML required in most cases.
Low; requires KYC/AML compliance.
Trading Fees
Often lower; fees depend on blockchain network.
Higher; charged per trade, withdrawal, and deposits.
Asset Availability
Wide range; supports long-tail assets.
Limited; prioritizes popular and regulated assets.
Order Types
Limited; typically basic (swap, market orders).
Advanced; market, limit, stop-loss, margin trading, etc.
Interoperability
High; supports cross-chain trades via bridges.
Limited; trades occur within the platform.
Smart Contract Risks
Present; relies on the security of smart contracts.
Absent; no dependency on smart contracts.
Customer Support
None or limited; community-driven assistance.
Comprehensive; dedicated support teams available.
Ownership
User-owned; no intermediaries.
Platform-owned; operates on centralized authority.
Reliability
Dependent on blockchain uptime.
High; relies on platform infrastructure.
Accessibility
Global access without restrictions.
Region-restricted based on regulations.
Trading Pairs
Flexible; allows any pair supported by smart contracts.
Limited; depends on listed pairs.
Market Making
Algorithmic via AMM or liquidity pools.
Centralized by professional market makers.
Leverage/Derivatives
Rare; limited options.
Common; provides high leverage and various derivatives.
Governance
Community-driven; often uses governance tokens.
Centralized; managed by the company.
Innovation
Fast-paced; supports DeFi, NFTs, and new protocols.
Slow; prioritizes stability over innovation.
Risk of Downtime
Minimal; operates 24/7 without intermediaries.
Present; subject to maintenance and server issues.
Compliance Costs
Low; avoids regulatory costs.
High; adheres to strict legal frameworks.
Fraud Risk
Lower; no centralized authority to scam users.
Higher; risk of exchange insolvency or fraud.
Revenue Model
Fees from liquidity providers and traders.
Fees from trading, withdrawals, and deposits.
Trust Requirement
Trustless; relies on code and blockchain.
Requires trust in the platform and its operators.
Community Involvement
High; governed by token holders.
Low; users have minimal input in decision-making.
Scalability
Limited by blockchain technology.
High; centralized architecture allows for scaling.
Keywords
Liquidity, نقدینگی, Security, امنیت, Transparency, شفافیت, Decentralization, غیرمتمرکز, Regulation, قانون‌گذاری, Custody, امانت‌داری, Trading Fees, کارمزد معاملات, KYC, احراز هویت, Smart Contracts, قراردادهای هوشمند, Interoperability, قابلیت همکاری, Asset Availability, دسترسی به دارایی‌ها, User Control, کنترل کاربران, Order Types, انواع سفارش, Privacy, حریم خصوصی, Speed, سرعت, Governance, حاکمیت, Customer Support, پشتیبانی مشتری, Leverage, اهرم, Derivatives, مشتقات, Market Making, بازارسازی, Trading Pairs, جفت‌ارزها, Blockchain, بلاکچین, Reliability, قابلیت اطمینان, Compliance, انطباق, Innovation, نوآوری, Scalability, مقیاس‌پذیری, Fraud Risk, ریسک تقلب, Accessibility, دسترسی, Revenue Model, مدل درآمدی, Trust, اعتماد, Community Involvement, مشارکت جامعه
Visit me on:
🚀 Finance & Trading Insights: fxc911.ir
🐦 Twitter: x.com/fxc911_official/
Last updated